Regionalized Hybrid Courts
In: Forthcoming in Hybrid Justice (Kirsten Ainley & Mark Kersten, eds., Oxford University Press)
15 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Forthcoming in Hybrid Justice (Kirsten Ainley & Mark Kersten, eds., Oxford University Press)
SSRN
In: Forthcoming, The Oxford Research Handbook on Global Legal Pluralism (2019)
SSRN
In: 13 FIU Law Review (2019), Forthcoming
SSRN
In: American University International Law Review, Band 32, S. 611
SSRN
In: New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy QUORUM, November 2015
SSRN
In: Washington University Global Studies Law Review, Band 14, S. 243
SSRN
In: Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Band 47, S. 625
SSRN
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 104, S. 31-33
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs, Band 14
SSRN
In: Oregon Review of International Law, Symposium Issue, Vol. 10, p. 361, 2008
SSRN
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 97, Heft 1, S. 107-108
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: Immigration, Integration, and Security, S. 164-180
In: Yale Journal of International Law, Band 32, S. 1
SSRN
In: The Security Continuum: Global Politics in the Modern Age
"Recent acts of terrorism in Britain and Europe and the events of 9/11 in the United States have greatly influenced immigration, security, and integration policies in these countries. Yet many of the current practices surrounding these issues were developed decades ago, and are ill-suited to the dynamics of today's global economies and immigration patterns. At the core of much policy debate is the inherent paradox whereby immigrant populations are frequently perceived as posing a potential security threat yet bolster economies by providing an inexpensive workforce. Strict attention to border controls and immigration quotas has diverted focus away from perhaps the most significant dilemma: the integration of existing immigrant groups. Often restricted in their civil and political rights and targets of xenophobia, racial profiling, and discrimination, immigrants are unable or unwilling to integrate into the population. These factors breed distrust, disenfranchisement, and hatred-factors that potentially engender radicalization and can even threaten internal security. The contributors compare policies on these issues at three relational levels: between individual EU nations and the U.S., between the EU and U.S., and among EU nations. What emerges is a timely and critical examination of the variations and contradictions in policy at each level of interaction and how different agencies and different nations often work in opposition to each other with self-defeating results. While the contributors differ on courses of action, they offer fresh perspectives, some examining significant case studies and laying the groundwork for future debate on these crucial issues."--Publisher's description
In: The Security Continuum: Global Politics in the Modern Age
"Recent acts of terrorism in Britain and Europe and the events of 9/11 in the United States have greatly influenced immigration, security, and integration policies in these countries. Yet many of the current practices surrounding these issues were developed decades ago, and are ill-suited to the dynamics of today's global economies and immigration patterns. At the core of much policy debate is the inherent paradox whereby immigrant populations are frequently perceived as posing a potential security threat yet bolster economies by providing an inexpensive workforce. Strict attention to border controls and immigration quotas has diverted focus away from perhaps the most significant dilemma: the integration of existing immigrant groups. Often restricted in their civil and political rights and targets of xenophobia, racial profiling, and discrimination, immigrants are unable or unwilling to integrate into the population. These factors breed distrust, disenfranchisement, and hatred-factors that potentially engender radicalization and can even threaten internal security. The contributors compare policies on these issues at three relational levels: between individual EU nations and the U.S., between the EU and U.S., and among EU nations. What emerges is a timely and critical examination of the variations and contradictions in policy at each level of interaction and how different agencies and different nations often work in opposition to each other with self-defeating results. While the contributors differ on courses of action, they offer fresh perspectives, some examining significant case studies and laying the groundwork for future debate on these crucial issues."--Publisher's description